Antedating West Side Grouds Photos

We also present a view from the 1902 season that depicts Jim St. Vrain on the mound with a clear view of the left field line grandstands, just below. An image of Dusty Miller from the same year provides a view of the roofed grandstands just behind home plate. Though the ballpark opened in 1893, we had never seen any earlier WSG photos anywhere. The 1890s at WSG were oddly dark.

Jim St. Vrain and Dusty Miller

A few known woodcut images from Chicago newspapers did create some illumination. The WSG grandstand under construction is shown below as it appeared in the 04-14-1893 Chicago Record. The description therein reads:

New West Side Ball Grounds…Seats for Thirteen Thousand…A small army of workmen is engaged on the new ball grounds of the National League club at Lincoln and Polk streets…put in readiness for the opening Sunday game on May 13.

These grounds will be the scene of the Sunday games played by the league club this year…The present calculation is for a seating capacity of 13,000…Mr. Hart says that no more will be admitted to games than can be supplied with seats…Experience has shown…[that] crowds are much more unruly if not seated, and inasmuch as we expect to have the best decorum at Sunday games, we will not tempt the disorderly element by letting them in without having a place for them to sit.”

The grandstand is to be the largest in the country, but no work has yet been done on the bleachers [take note of that]…they may eventually skirt the entire outfield…The worst defect about the grounds is a short right field…

The grandstand faces southeast, the main entrance being at the corner of Lincoln and Polk streets, but there will also be gates at which tickets will be sold to the bleachers.

A contemporary 1893 drawing of the plan for West Side Grounds appeared in the Chicago Tribune as the ball park neared completion.

The caption read: The above cut shows the plan of the new West Side baseball grounds at Lincoln and Polk streets, now rapidly approaching completion. The grounds can be reached by the Ogden Avenue, Van Buren, Harrison, Taylor, and Twelfth street cars. They [the grounds] are 475 feet square, exclusive of the carriage yard [i.e. parking lot]. The seating capacity is enormous, consisting of 3,000 folding arm chairs, 500 arm chairs in fifty-six private boxes, 4,500 seats in a covered pavilion, and 5,000 open ones. Eight hundred thousand feet of timber were used in the construction of the stands. The diamond will be 90 feet from the grandstand. The right field and left field fences are 340 feet from the home plate, the extreme center filed is 560 feet. The Cincinnatis will open the park May 14. It is probable that after this season all the games will be played there.

We should take note of the planned capacity of 13,000. That’s all very nice, but still no photo.

My jaw dropped when collector/researcher Jim Chapman sent me this scan:

It was in a scrapbook with a label below the photo reading, “Ball Park West Side – Chicago.” Though there is some difference in ballpark structure when compared to the 1902 version of West Side Grounds, it was apparent that this was indeed an image of the same place, and if the seemingly contemporary caption written on the photo is to be believed, this dates to when the N.L. had a team in Baltimore. So, when would a Chicago vs. Baltimore matchup been possible at the West Side Grounds? That would have been between 1893 and 1899, after the West Side Grounds were built and both teams played in the National League. Let’s first compare this photo to West Side Grounds in 1902.

Below we have the left field line area seating from the photo in question at top, and the left field line seating at West Side grounds as seen in 1902 at bottom. For spatial reference, the dotted black line squares denote the same building in both images. The green and red boxes outline the same sections of seating in both images. The yellow outlined section of seating is present in 1902, but is missing from the photo in question. It is reasonable to think that the scrapbook photo is therefore at least pre-1902. Note particularly the double dividing fences between the red and green sections (white arrows) which seem to have a unique structure and are identical in both photos. Also note that matching details for the fencing in front of the seating (solid base for bottom half, screen with fence posts for top half, light blue arrows).

The March 13, 1896 edition of the Chicago Tribune, page 8, is reproduced below. Also, a permit for the new construction was reported in the Tribune on April 3, 1896. While we can’t be sure whether or not any seating was actually provided for the red and green areas when the park opened in 1893, it appears that the red and green sections in the photo in question matches that in the 1902 photo (and, as previously stated, this includes the details of the dividing fence and fencing in front of the seating areas). Therefore it is a good bet that the photo in question depicts these new “bleachers” dating it to 1896 or later.

A woodcut depicting the new construction (above) appeared in the Chicago Tribune on April 30, 1896. The red and green seating areas are marked and the photo in question is again reproduced below the woodcut. The date of the further addition of the yellow section remains unknown. We only know that was after 1896 and earlier than 1902.

The Tribune’s phrase “double the seating capacity” raises some confusion. As previously shown, the original plan was for 13,000 seats. We can be certain that the 1896 construction did not come close to expanding the ball park to 26,000 seats. One source* pegs capacity at 14,200 in 1908, and that is after the addition of the yellow section, expanded outfield bleachers, and a modest amount of upper deck seating. Our best guess is that when it opened in in 1893, the park had substantially less than the planned for 13,000 seats (initially no seats in red and green areas?). We expect that the initial planned capacity may have been reached after the new construction in 1896. Then, a crowd of, say, over 15,000, would still result in noticeable fan overflow onto the field.

For Chicago, the 1896-1899 seasons were pretty miserable. To the contrary, for Baltimore, there was a National League pennant in 1896 (as well as 1894-5) and 2nd place finishes in 1897 and 1898. It seems like a good guess that one of those squads could draw an overflow crowd to WSG. Let’s see if we can narrow down the date. We can start by focusing in on the uniforms.

Zooming in on our photo, the truth is we can’t see much. One team is all in white, the other appears to be a few shades darker (like road gray) with dark caps and socks.

The all white uniform above left is dated 1896-1897 on Craig Brown’s Threads of Our Game site:
https://www.threadsofourgame.com/1896-chicago/ It surely matches what we see in the 1896 team photo from the 1897 Spading guide above right. For 1898, Craig shows a change to colored socks and cap bills (below left). This is verified in the 1898 team photo below right. See https://www.threadsofourgame.com/1898-chicago/

For 1899 things are a bit more interesting with the addition of a logo on the cap. If you are interested as to why there is a “Y”, it was a recognized representation used for the City of Chicago. Details are here, again courtesy of Craig Brown’s site. https://www.threadsofourgame.com/1899-chicago/

Given the lack of sharp detail for the photo under discussion, all we can say is that any of the above uniforms are consistent with it.

In the WSG photo the visitors are wearing dark caps and socks. Comparing this to Craig Brown’s road uniform renderings below, this is again consistent with the 1896 and 1897 seasons, but not 1898. The 1898 Baltimore team photo, taken on the road, does show white (or gray) caps. The 1899 team photo and also Threads rendering far right does show a reversion to dark caps and socks. This also indicates a likely date range for the WSG photo to 1896-1897, with 1899 still possible.

Given the large overflow crowd present in the WSG photo, let’s take a look at attendance figures for Baltimore visits to WSG in 1896, 1897 and 1899. These numbers are from the Chicago Tribune and The Daily Inter-Ocean reports. Note that the largest crowd for a Baltimore visit in 1898 was only 7,500, so that along with the uniform mismatch for both teams adds certainty to the elimination of 1898 from contention. The three candidates are shown in red.

1896
May 14 Thur2,500
May 15 Fri4,500
May 16 Sat9,000
May 17 Sun18,921
July 7 Tue4,600
July 8 Wed6,100
1897
May 30 Sun17,800
May 31 Mon2,650
July 15 Thur4,135
July 16 Fri5,184
July 17 Sat10,280
July 18 Sun12,250

1899
May 19 Fri2,700
May 20 Sat7,000
May 21 Sun17,617
July 22 Sat7,500
July 23 Sun 9000
July 24 Mon2,700
July 25 Tue3,000

Red indicates an expectation of considerable fan overflow onto the field.

It appears from the photo that the Baltimore pitcher was a right-hander. For the dates in red, righty Bill Hoffer pitched in 1896 and 1897, and righty Joe McGinnity was the hurler in the 1899 game. That is consistent with the photo, but no help in narrowing down the date.

The largest crowd was for the 1896 game, and the May 18, 1896 Chicago Tribune described the overflow of fans onto the field (see right). For the 1897 game, The Daily Inter Ocean described a crowd “which poured out on the field.” Given the attendance figures, it seems that this must have also occurred for the 1899 game.

The 1899 game seems the less likely of the three due to the home team in the photo wearing light colored socks. What we can say is that, to date, this the earliest known photo of West Side Grounds and that it is a National League Baltimore vs. Chicago game action image that took place on one of three possible dates in the 1890s. That’s not bad.

Additional reading:
1900 snapshots of West Side Grounds

Revisiting the 1910 Brooklyn Superbas

By Ken Samoil


The December 2018 issue of the SABR Pictorial History Committee newsletter included an article about two images of the Brooklyn National League baseball team from the first decade of the twentieth century.  One of those images was from a real photo postcard (RPPC of the 1910 Superbas:

George Bell –Tim Jordan –Ed Lennox –Red Downey –Elmer Knetzer –Frank Schneiberg –Paul Sentelle –John Hummel–Doc Scanlon–Harry Lumley–Bill Bergen
Rube Dessau –? King –Nap Rucker –George Hunter –Kaiser Wilhelm –Harry McIntyre–? Ulrich
Otto Miller –Tex Erwin –Zach Wheat –Pryor McElveen –Al Burch –Bill Dahlen –Tommy McMillan–George Schirm –Jake Daubert –Hi Myers

The article stated that “We had last names only for the RPPC.  It took a bit of research, but we figured out the first names for all but two of those present in the photo, including a few who did not make the roster.  We still need first names for King and Ulrich.”

Searching the archives of the Brooklyn Standard Union and the Brooklyn Daily Eagle provides the identity for these two players.  (The Standard Union is archived at https://fultonsearch.org/, along with many other newspapers.  The Daily Eagle is available online at https://bklyn.newspapers.com/#.)  The Standard Union edition of January 22, 1910, has an article titled “Thirty-One Players the Nucleus for Dahlen’s First Division Hopefuls”, about the players who will train with Brooklyn in Hot Springs, Arkansas.  Ulrich is described as a catcher from New Bedford in the New England League.  That identifies him as Fred Ulrich (also identified as Randolph Ulrich in the news reports), who had played for New Bedford in 1909.  Another catcher that was reportedly set to train with the team was “little Johnny King, the Brooklyn boy”.  Later articles in these newspapers, from March, 1910, confirmed that Ulrich and King were with the Superbas when the team was in Hot Springs.  King, who had previously played semi-professional ball, did not make the major league team that season.  An article in the Daily Eagle on April 11th stated that he was going to play for the York (Pennsylvania) team (in the Tri-State League), but he does not appear on the York team’s records for that season and (according to a later Daily Eagle article) instead played for the Brooklyn Edison Electric Company team.  Ulrich was kept on the Brooklyn roster at the start of the season, but he did not accompany the team on road trips nor did he appear in a home game, and he eventually went back to play for New Bedford.

That information would seem to complete the identities of the personnel in the RPPC, but there are more uncertainties to resolve.  This photo of the 1910 Brooklyn team was printed in both the Standard Union and the Daily Eagle on March 20, 1910, with the players’ last names (the same names that were indicated in the PHC newsletter article):

Look closely at the newspaper photo.  The images of the players identified as Lennox, Sentelle, and Lumley (third, seventh, and tenth players from the left, respectively, in the back row) have been pasted in over the faces in the actual photo. The clarity of the image in the RPPC makes it apparent that this was the original image, and that it had been altered before being published in the newspapers.

By perusing the baseball articles from March, 1910, in these papers, we know that the Brooklyn team arrived in Hot Springs on March 4, 1910, with all of the players identified in the newspaper caption except Harry Lumley and Ed Lennox.  Lumley was delayed by floods near his home and joined the team on March 9th, and Lennox was ill and joined the team sometime after Lumley.  It is likely that the original photo was taken before the arrival of these two.  Paul Sentelle (also spelled Sentell) was with the team at this time; we can only guess why he missed the group photograph.  The players listed in the caption are the only ones who are mentioned in the articles as training with the team that month.  One other person is indicated as being with the team during that time–trainer Dan Comerford (also spelled Commerford).  He appears in a well-known photo of the team that was published in the Daily Eagle on April 10, 1907, in the bottom row at the far left:

When we compare Comerford from the 1907 photo to the man in Sentelle’s position in the back row of the 1910 photo, we have a match:

That leaves two men to be identified in the RPPC; third from left and second from right in the back row.  The man who is third from the left appears to be wearing dark pants with a light-colored shirt; this may not be a baseball uniform.  It is entirely possible that he was not a ballplayer, but was instead a clubhouse man or groundskeeper at Hot Springs.  The man who is second from the right appears to have on a shirt with a 1909 New York Highlanders logo on his left sleeve.  This person could be someone who had been on the Highlanders’ roster and was trying to catch on with Brooklyn for 1910.  (At that time, ballplayers typically wore their uniforms from a previous season during spring training.)  It is also possible that a minor league team had a similar logo, or that the logo isn’t what it seems from the angle that we see it in the RPPC.  The identity of these two men remains a mystery.